Spring 2017 - Q10 Part B
Can the loss ratio method be used to obtain the Indicated Relativities? I'm not sure why they have used only the Ultimate Loss Cost to project the Indicated Relativities?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Can the loss ratio method be used to obtain the Indicated Relativities? I'm not sure why they have used only the Ultimate Loss Cost to project the Indicated Relativities?
Comments
No, the loss ratio method is for calculating an indicated rate change. That's different from calculating indicated relativities for territories.
To calculate relativities, we need the loss costs for each territory so we can compare them. Then territories with higher loss costs get higher relativities and those with lower loss costs get lower relativities. This is done by dividing each territory's loss cost by the base territory (territory B.)
Are loss costs and total losses analogous? Or do loss costs imply loss / exposure?
In the Werner text, "loss cost" means "losses / exposures". It's synonymous with "pure premium". (So "loss costs" and "losses" are different things.)
Thanks Graham :)
You're welcome!
I did not understand how to account for the policy fee in this problem. How is the policy fee of $50 different from fixed expense of $55? Particularly, say the give the above details and ask us to calculate the indicated average rate change. Do we just take 50+55=105 as the fixed expense in the numerator (pure premium method) or do we account for the policy fee in a different manner?
One more conceptual doubt. I have understood why we need to find an indicated base rate after finding the indicated rate relativities. But why are we asked to find indicated policy fee, which I feel is like asking the indicated fixed expense? Isn't that taken care of when we project fixed expense? Here I am thinking policy fee is similar to fixed expense, so please correct me if I am wrong.
The policy fee and fixed expense are treated differently in ratemaking because they have distinct purposes and are accounted for in separate parts of the calculation.
1. Policy Fee vs Fixed Expense:
2. How to Account for the Policy Fee:
3. Indicated Policy Fee vs Fixed Expense:
Therefore, you should not combine the policy fee with the fixed expense in the numerator of the pure premium method. The fixed expense is adjusted within the premium calculation, and the policy fee is added at the end as a separate component.
Thank you very much Graham!! It's very clear now.