jono123
About
- Username
- jono123
- Joined
- Visits
- 74
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thank you so much!
-
I think so! Somehow it all somewhat came together. Thank you.
-
I'm starting to get it.. I tried to solve the problem using a base rate change to get to the same overall impact for my own understanding; attached for reference. https://www.battleactsmain.ca/battleacts5.ca/forum5/uploads/714/9CPGCFWPIX4V.xlsx I t…
-
Oh.. I think the answer to my 2nd question is that you can do it either way, but if you apply the shortfall to the original premium, then you need to apply that change to the original indicated change relativity (i.e. add the original indicated rela…
-
This may be a basic question, but do loss frequency and severity trends always (unless otherwise stated) apply to ALAE like they did in this question?
-
Ok thank you!
-
I got it from page 6 of the one-stop pricing PDF: PowerPack_Station2_(Pricing)_(v2).pdf (battleacts5.ca)
-
Ok, thank you. Although it's a bit odd to me, I'll take it as it is.
-
I apologize, especially since this probably is not really worth the time for either of us, but I really don't understand how the policyholder would be responsible for $60 as of the endorsement date moving forward. Where am I wrong in these steps? …
-
I'm a bit confused about how $60 was written on the endorsement, though. $60 is the full-term premium, but it was endorsed halfway through the policy, so I would think that the written premium from the endorsement was just $30, and so in-force woul…
-
Wait.. applying frequency and severity trend is the same thing as applying pure premium trend. I guess my question then just becomes: why isn't exposure trend applied here?
-
Are most questions of this type generally going to give full credit to those that use the 8-point and/or 12-point trends for the historical selection, even though it might not be as accurate*? The ambiguity regarding the current period and thus th…