Questions regarding Exam 6C
- For the three reasons the insurance industry was singled out for solvency regulations: what do they mean by short term price competition? Does that imply that volatility for premiums between insurers is bad?
- For the Chief Actuary question I had, can you give me an example of the differentiation of the work between the AA and Chief Actuary? Does the chief actuary play a part in valuation or the FCT process?
- What does the Smart Regulation part of the action plan mean? Are they saying that having an arms-length regulator is important but not one that limits competition? Also would investment in health care be considered an item in the "Action Plan"?
- Is question #4 of Fall 2019 outdated? It revolves around BC auto insurance.
- What is the difference between a judicial policy directive and rule of law? (Ter Neuzen v Korn - if you have a memorization trick for this one it be greatly appreciated !)
- For the PACICC Compensation fund, why would PACICC be borrowing money from this fund? Isn't the point of the fund to cover PH whose insurers went bankrupt? Or does the borrowing imply that the fund is self-sustainable -> ie there needs to be a min amount of money in the fund?
- What does "involuntary market exit costs" mean? Also, aside from bankruptcy what is another form of involuntary market exit cost? This is from the PACICC reading.
- Can you explain what "Asset for Future Income Taxes" is? Does it refer to prepaid-taxes?
Thanks a lot!
Comments
Hi @olidude3121
I'm starting with the 2 questions that I think are the most important:
Question 4:
Question 8:
I will answer your other questions in order over the next few days.
Question 1:
Question 2:
Question 3:
The source text doesn't provide any further information on those topics and you would not need to know anything more detailed for the exam. Check these 2 exams problems to see the level of detail you need to know:
https://battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2019_2-Fall)/(2019_2-Fall)_(03).pdf
Question 5:
I'm not a lawyer but the way I interpreted that is as follows:
a judicial policy directive is something that has been deemed good policy and should generally be followed in making a decision, but it doesn't have to be followed
That might not be how a lawyer would explain it but I think that's all you would need to understand for the exam.
Question 6:
Question 7:
Thanks for the clarification