However in battle card #15 they suggest a large portion of inherent value being paid out means a high exit value and actually increases liquidity.

Are we required to know this PV calculation for the purpose of calculating discounting effect for taxes?

I'm comparing the answer from this battlecard against the battlecard from CIA.IFRS17 (I know this is outdated) and I realized one card said it includes transaction tax but the other said IFRS17 exclu…

Battle Card #15, describe a method for RA for ceded losses related to cat reinsurance and high percentile events.

Would the calculations in Fall 2019 #15 be testable? How would part a and b be revised under IFRS? An example would be helpful to see how old questions would be modified. Thanks!

I found another example - 2018 Fall #15 that use 'floor' for prem liab, and was banging my head against the wall in confusion.. ha

text reference part content CIA.MfAD E (2017.Fall #27) c see CIA.Discnt CIA.MfAD E (2016.Spring #15) b see CIA.Discnt CIA.MfAD E (2015.Fall #26) a see CIA.Discnt

Hi,

Please see: https://www.battleactsmain.ca/wiki6c/2016.Fall_Q15_Redone (for more context, please see the '2016.Fall #15 Redone' section under https://www.battleactsmain.ca/wiki6c/CIA.PrLiabs#Duration_o

For Fall 2017 #15: We already calculated Premium Deficiency = 4687, but it's stated in the conclusion that "Note that there is no premium deficiency or DPAE for facility given that net unearned p

2018 Spring #15b, when calculating the discounted LR for AY 2014, the denominator is EP + InvInc from UPR. Based on my understanding the annual rate needed to calculate the InvInc from UPR should be a

What do you do on the exam to calculate the APV of premium liabilities if they give you the discounted loss ratio instead of the undiscounted LR?