There are no questions under Battle Quiz #3. Is this intentional?

1) Suppose PAA = 500, GMA = 700: then PAA - GMA = -200 will be less than any aggregate threshold. Is the aggregate threshold (Threshold #3 in the example) supposed to be compared against abs(PAA-GMA)?

Please can you check if the answer for the following question should be corrected for outcomes #2 & #3?

Hello,

In the CIA.Rein paper, Risk Transfer Principle #3 states that the entire agreement must be considered which includes any verbal or written agreements. However, in the Freihaut Risk Transfer paper it s

Battle card 3 says reins investment rate should not be relevant in risk transfer test, battle card 4 #3 says reins expected investment rate can be an alternative to the risk free rate for risk transfe

Since this question is quite old, just want to confirm that the answer for 3b using the most recent guidelines would be "not eligible since territory 4 falls outside of the interval of -10% to +…

I assume you are referring to part b. of S2019 #3. The question states: "Briefly describe two situations where an S.P.F. No. 9 policy purchased by a Transportation Network Company would not provi

Why is a physical damage claim not an acceptable answer for S2019 #3? This skateboarding example seems like a logical answer and is what I initially thought of for when SPF9 would not provide coverage

case #3 PAA and GMM used: B=11,300+5,900

for Quiz #31, do the two lines have significant difference? They sound the same to me.

Why, D was not forced to 0$ in the Problem #3 of the MCT workbook given that the question did not specifically state that the reinsurance receivables was coming from a Foreign branch ?

Why premium payable is not included in (F) in the MCT excel worksheet Problem #3 (see upload picture from 2024 MCT Guidelines)?

There is numerous errors in the answer of Quiz C in BattleCard#3, I recommend to review all the questions & answers in this one.

It says that Group #2: Combine old group #3 & #5 into new Group #2

I still don't get point #3. Why is the formula not just premiums receivable * cancellation adj. * discount factor?

This is regarding the Battle Card #31.

Battle card #3:

It applies to both. The difference between OCI and non-OCI is explained further down in the paper in Approach #3

Hi, it seems that the answer to BattleCards "what is the recommended loss distribution percentile for a solvency scenario" is not updated. The current answer is "95th → 99th percentile…