Individual cases in the Trilogy
Most of the time, the text refers to the trilogy simply as the trilogy rarely refering tp the specific cases. And at the beginning of the text, the author seems to focus more about the first case Andrews v. Grand & Toy Albert. There is one quick reference to Leno v. Arnold at p. 3, but I think that's all. I'm not even sure I see a reference to Thornton v. Prince George School District No. 57. Do we have more detail somewhere about the contribution of the individual cases or it is fine to use them "as a whole" (as THE trilogy)?
Comments
It is fine to just use the trilogy - No need to know about the individual cases