Alberta Cap on non-pecuniary damages

ChristoRoyerChristoRoyer
in CIA.Subseq

I notice that in the example #2, it says that the cap of $4000 for non-pecuniary damage related to soft-tissue injuries in car accident was struck down in 2008. However, I remember that in Morrow v. Zhang, in 2009 the Court upheld the cap.

Is this example in the Subsequent Event text only an hypothetical case and the cap is still in force? Or the example refers to the time between Ruling 1 and 2 of Morrow v. Zhang?

Comments

  • Staff-T1Staff-T1

    I don't think the subsequent event paper relates to the time between ruling 1 and 2 as this paper was written in 2012. I think they are just giving a hypothetical answer. Always answer the legal cases EXACTLY as they are in the legal papers source material

Sign In or Register to comment.