'on battle day'
Will you be creating a 'on battle day' prep like you did with previous sittings? i.e. topics that are likely/unlikely, a sample perhaps?
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Will you be creating a 'on battle day' prep like you did with previous sittings? i.e. topics that are likely/unlikely, a sample perhaps?
Comments
Actually, I stopped trying to make such specific predictions in the On BattleDay article because it seemed almost random whether or not I got it right. But there still are a lot of things that are predictable about the exam, for example:
In general, when I read the source readings I always try to think about what would be a good question. Then I include that material in the wiki and make a few BattleCards so my predictions are already embedded in the content.
I know that isn't the answer you wanted. One prediction I might make is that they'll ask something from CIA.Models. That's a new reading, and they asked questions from the other 3 new readings last time, so CIA.Models should be due to come up. If I were taking the exam again, I'd make sure I knew that one pretty well.
This is actually very helpful, thanks!
Another question I thought of was whether you had any thoughts on the likelihood of the exam featuring a large amount of questions (i.e. identify style questions) that have never appeared on previous exams? Is it possible they flip the exam on its head without changing the syllabus?
YW! Oh, and I forgot to mention the practice exam I created. That also has implicit predictions. You can get that here:
Yes, I found the practice exam quite helpful in identifying my weaker areas. Thanks!