2014.Fall #19a
Answered my own question, made a mistake and was looking at the wrong year.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Answered my own question, made a mistake and was looking at the wrong year.
Comments
When students reach the point of answering their own questions, my work is done! Slay the beast!
Hi Graham,
Why are we not using the usual (APV(NU.beg)-APV(NU.end)-Paid.all)/APV(NU.beg)) formula? I get a ratio of 0.56%. I thought the difference between undiscounted and discounted excess ratio was only the the II term on the numerator? We are not even including PfADs in part a). I'll wait for your answer before discussing part b).
Thanks,
undiscounted so we can ignore the discounting and PfAD adjustments.
There are 2 differences between the undiscounted and discounted formula for excess(deficiency) ratio. In the undiscounted ratio:
Then the result is:
Then you do part (b) the "normal" way:
I didn't show the calculation of ii, which works out to 6.507 (in 000s). You can check the examiner's report for that.
Hi Graham, I am a little bit confused by the wording of the question. I think that I interpreted "for year 2012" as both accident year 2011 and 2012.
Is it fair to assume that: "for year 2012" = "for ACCIDENT year 2012"?
You are right that the question wasn't clear. Your interpretation is reasonable and I just noticed the next time an excess/deficiency question was asked, which was 2015.Spring Q21, they explicitly stated accident year. All exams subsequent to that also clearly state either accident year or calendar year. I'm guessing other people made the same interpretation you did and the examiners realized they needed to state the question more clearly. (The most common way of asking the question is accident year.)