Fall 2018 Q16
Hello,
Could you explain the payment pattern?
I am not sure why for 2016, 2017 the numbers chosen such as 0.3/0.8 and 0.5/0.8 and 0.5/0.5 are chosen.
Also the A, is the ceded liability just the same as the unpaid claims recov as an asset? same logic?
Thank you
Comments
Payment pattern:
Another way of expressing this (incremental) payment pattern given in the question is:
Note that often the payment pattern is given in cumulative form, but here it is incremental. Anyway, you have to rebase the payment pattern for each year. The given data is "as of" the end of 2017 so for each AY, we have to distribute the payments across subsequent calendar years.
A:
Yes, the liability for the ceded unpaid amount is the same as the asset for the unpaid claims recoverable. The ceded liabilities and reinsurance recoverable assets should always balance out.
Hi Graham,
Also for the discount rate, we use book values of the bonds but sometimes in the question we seem to use the market value. Could you clarify thedifference between the two and when each should be used?
Thank you,
That's from a reading that's no longer on the syllabus. If you have to calculate the discount rate based on bonds, they should either tell you whether to use book or market value, but more likely they will give you only one or the other so you wouldn't have a choice.
Actually, the most likely version of this type of problem is that they give you the discount rate directly so you wouldn't have to worry about book or market value anyway.