Alberta Auto Committee Findings Battlecard
• high premiums were caused by increasing bodily injury costs
(specifically non-pecuniary awards for pain & suffering due to the tort system)
• no mechanisms existed to control these BI costs
Bullet point #1, aren't non-pec awards capped at 100K? Why would it still be driving BI costs?
Bullet point #2, doesn't AB now have a 4K cap on minor injuries (Morrow v Zhang)? So there technically is a mechanism to control BI costs?
Thanks,
Comments
I guess it's just strange to me that non-pec awards even though they are capped would still be driving the cost. I guess if there wasn't a cap, then Auto insurance would virtually be unaffordable if it's this bad already with a cap?
I think it's hard to tell without seeing the actual numbers broken down by category ~ Right now we are just speculating