min(Claim Liabilities, Reported Reserves) = Claim Liabilities
When would you end up with Claim Liabilities > Reported Reserves?
This would be at worst illegal (in some jurisdictions) and at best would result in a unfavorable statement from the Appointed Actuary.
So... why not write min(Claim Liabilities, Reported Reserves) = Claim Liabilities?
Or is this provision (min) left for non-material differences between Claim Liabilities & Reported Reserves?
Comments
My thought here is that the AA may calculate a range of reasonable estimates for claim liabilities in addition to a point estimate. The reported reserve might be less than the point estimate, but still within the AA's acceptable range.
Thanks, very helpful