xuchaofan
About
- Username
- xuchaofan
- Joined
- Visits
- 36
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Thank you @graham ! I agree and I also don't like this question.
-
Thanks @graham
-
Hi, Anyone noticed that the rebased final proposed for Territory 2 (1.0088) is higher than the rebased indicated (1.01/0.94555*0.9401)=1.0042? This is not satisfactory for condition 2. Same thing for @graham 's solution (1.0056>1.0042). I w…
-
Thank you @graham ! That helped. I agree that it's hard to know how they ask to calculate even without any example in the paper. Hope if they ask such calculation question, it will be easy to do by knowing correctly the steps.
-
Thank you @graham. Now I understand.
-
Thank @graham
-
I see. I am not there yet. Thank you!
-
@graham Thank you! That's very clear!
-
Thank you @graham !
-
Thank you @graham !
-
Hi @graham. I think you still didn't have time to change the BattleCards. Also, in the current paper, the "sound and comprehensive earthquake exposure management policy" should also be overseen by the senior management, instead of the board. Thank y…
-
Hi @graham, No, I don't have any specific question. But as DulcineaDelCA mentioned, the Net Investment Income in this question included realized gain which was not consistent with other exam questions. But I do agree that the safest way is to state …
-
@graham, I has been also confused by the 2018 Fall #24 that @DulcineaDelCA mentioned.