Difference between revisions of "BCAR.Cat"
(→The Concept of Tolerance) |
|||
(18 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Best's Capital Adequacy Rating for Catastrophes explains how to asses an insurer's ability to withstand a secondary catastrophe after a primary catastrophe. Catastrophe exposure is still often high even after a primary event. Cats can have a major impact on financial stability because they are '''S'''ignificant, '''U'''nexpected, and '''R'''apid (SUR). For a good rating, AM Best expects insurers to be able to <u>manage</u> risk and <u>absorb</u> losses. | + | '''Reading''': Catastrophe Analysis in A.M. Best Ratings |
− | + | ||
+ | '''Authour''': A.M. Best Company, Inc., A.M. Best Methodology | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/categories/bcar-cat<span style="font-size: 12px; background-color: lightgrey; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 0px;">'''Forum'''</span>] | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class='wikitable' style='background-color: navajowhite; | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | || '''BA Quick-Summary''': <span style="color: green;>'''Best’s Catastrophe Analysis'''</span> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * AM Best assesses insurers' ability to handle catastrophic losses by reviewing their risk management, catastrophe modeling, and financial preparedness, ensuring they can withstand major disasters. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Insurers with strong catastrophe risk management and financial flexibility receive better ratings, while those with poor risk controls or weak financials may see lower ratings due to higher exposure to catastrophic events. | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Best's Capital Adequacy Rating (BCAR) for Catastrophes explains how to asses an insurer's ability to withstand a secondary catastrophe after a primary catastrophe. Catastrophe exposure is still often high even after a primary event. Cats can have a major impact on financial stability because they are '''S'''ignificant, '''U'''nexpected, and '''R'''apid (SUR). For a good rating, AM Best expects insurers to be able to <u>manage</u> risk and <u>absorb</u> losses. | ||
==Pop Quiz== | ==Pop Quiz== | ||
Line 97: | Line 112: | ||
:: '''stressed score:''' | :: '''stressed score:''' | ||
::* a score that reflects the ability of an insurer to continue operating even '''''after''''' a catastrophe ''(based on natural catastrophe stress test)'' | ::* a score that reflects the ability of an insurer to continue operating even '''''after''''' a catastrophe ''(based on natural catastrophe stress test)'' | ||
− | ::: → ''the standard BCAR score already has a catastrophe component so the stressed score | + | ::: → ''the standard BCAR score already has a catastrophe component so the stressed score measures the impact of a <u>second</u> catastrophe'' |
::* an insurer is then <u>assigned</u> 1 of 6 ratings based on it's stressed score ''(will be the same or lower than its standard score)'' | ::* an insurer is then <u>assigned</u> 1 of 6 ratings based on it's stressed score ''(will be the same or lower than its standard score)'' | ||
::* ''Note:'' the stress-test is necessary because an insurer still has cat exposure, <u>even after</u> the first cat event ''(Ex: aftershocks after a big earthquake)'' | ::* ''Note:'' the stress-test is necessary because an insurer still has cat exposure, <u>even after</u> the first cat event ''(Ex: aftershocks after a big earthquake)'' | ||
Line 134: | Line 149: | ||
In the previous section, we discussed the '''stressed BCAR score'''. This score is based on something called the natural catastrophe stress test. | In the previous section, we discussed the '''stressed BCAR score'''. This score is based on something called the natural catastrophe stress test. | ||
+ | The purpose of this test is to give insights on the '''balance sheet strength''' <u>after</u> it experiences a catastrophic event. | ||
:{| class="wikitable" | :{| class="wikitable" | ||
Line 143: | Line 159: | ||
# '''reinsurance:''' increase reinsurance recoverables by at least 40% of ceded PML | # '''reinsurance:''' increase reinsurance recoverables by at least 40% of ceded PML | ||
# '''reserves:''' increase reserves by 40% of net PML | # '''reserves:''' increase reserves by 40% of net PML | ||
− | # ''' | + | # '''reinsurance structure:''' adjust net pre-tax PMLs used in stress test if reinsurance structure changes after first event occurrence |
: After completing these 4 steps, recalculate the BCAR score according to the standard methodology. | : After completing these 4 steps, recalculate the BCAR score according to the standard methodology. | ||
− | : '''Note:''' This is <u>slightly different</u> from the answer given in examiner's reports for '''2018.Spring''' and prior. ''(The syllabus changed for ''' | + | : '''Note:''' This is <u>slightly different</u> from the answer given in examiner's reports for '''2018.Spring''' and prior. ''(The syllabus changed for '''2024.Spring)''' |
There is a forum thread regarding a ''[https://battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/384/stressed-bcar-calculation#latest calculation problem based on the natural catastrophe stress test]''. I think a calculation problem on this is unlikely but you can read my answer and see what you think. | There is a forum thread regarding a ''[https://battleactsmain.ca/vanillaforum/discussion/384/stressed-bcar-calculation#latest calculation problem based on the natural catastrophe stress test]''. I think a calculation problem on this is unlikely but you can read my answer and see what you think. | ||
Line 153: | Line 169: | ||
===Cat Risk Management=== | ===Cat Risk Management=== | ||
− | This concept overlaps with ''[[OSFI.Eqk]]'', and provides a good review. | + | This concept overlaps with ''[[OSFI.Eqk#Section_2:_Key_Principles_for_Managing_Earthquake_Exposure | OSFI.Eqk]]'', and provides a good review. |
:{| class="wikitable" | :{| class="wikitable" | ||
Line 160: | Line 176: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | :: '''catastrophe modeling:''' | + | :: '''catastrophe modeling:''' |
+ | ::* What-if scenario testing | ||
+ | ::* Parameter selection | ||
+ | ::* Base model output on realistic loss estimates | ||
+ | ::* Use more than 1 model | ||
:: '''data quality:''' | :: '''data quality:''' | ||
− | ::* accurate property location & coding ''(type of | + | ::* accurate property location & coding ''(type of building) |
::* accurate property value & insurance-to-value | ::* accurate property value & insurance-to-value | ||
::* conduct site reviews ''(so that information is up-to-date)'' | ::* conduct site reviews ''(so that information is up-to-date)'' | ||
− | ::* safeguards to prevent manipulation by insured | + | ::* safeguards to prevent manipulation by agent/underwriter ''(possibly on behalf of the insured)'' |
− | :: '''aggregate loss exposure:''' use aggregate losses as a secondary test of model | + | :: '''aggregate loss exposure:''' use aggregate losses as a secondary test of model and to consider unmodelled scenarios |
:: '''monitoring (MML):''' Measure, Monitor, Limit exposure on a continuous basis | :: '''monitoring (MML):''' Measure, Monitor, Limit exposure on a continuous basis | ||
− | The mini BattleQuiz also has an old exam question that asks you to compare BCAR to | + | The mini BattleQuiz also has an old exam question that asks you to compare BCAR to the FCT. |
[https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=BCAR&suffix=Cat§ion=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=2<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 2]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span> | [https://battleactsmain.ca/FC.php?selectString=**&filter=both&sortOrder=natural&colorFlag=allFlag&colorStatus=allStatus&priority=importance-high&subsetFlag=miniQuiz&prefix=BCAR&suffix=Cat§ion=all&subSection=all&examRep=all&examYear=all&examTerm=all&quizNum=2<span style="font-size: 20px; background-color: aqua; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 10px; padding: 2px 10px 2px 10px; margin: 10px;">'''mini BattleQuiz 2]'''</span> <span style="color: red;">'''You must be <u>logged in</u> or this will not work.'''</span> |
Latest revision as of 02:09, 8 March 2025
Reading: Catastrophe Analysis in A.M. Best Ratings
Authour: A.M. Best Company, Inc., A.M. Best Methodology
BA Quick-Summary: Best’s Catastrophe Analysis
|
Best's Capital Adequacy Rating (BCAR) for Catastrophes explains how to asses an insurer's ability to withstand a secondary catastrophe after a primary catastrophe. Catastrophe exposure is still often high even after a primary event. Cats can have a major impact on financial stability because they are Significant, Unexpected, and Rapid (SUR). For a good rating, AM Best expects insurers to be able to manage risk and absorb losses.
Contents
Pop Quiz
Which of the following are good catastrophe risk management techniques:
- measure exposure
- monitor exposure-accumulation
- limit exposure
BattleTable
Based on past exams, here is what you need to know (in rough order of importance):
- 4-step method for the natural catastrophe stress-test
- 4 factors affecting tolerance for stressed BCAR scores
- 4 elements of strong cat risk management (overlaps with OSFI.Eqk)
Top Questions ← Questions you absolutely need to know!
reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) part (e) E (2019.Spring #18) OSFI.MCT OSFI.MCT BCAR impact:
- of eqk on surplusOSFI.Eqk E (2018.Spring #22) cat risk management:
- data qualitynatural cat stress-test:
- second cattolerance:
- for stressed BCAR scoreE (2017.Fall #26) tolerance:
- for stressed BCAR scoreE (2017.Spring #23) see BCAR.Cdn see BCAR.Cdn see BCAR.Cdn natural cat stress-test:
- purposetolerance:
- for stressed BCAR scoreE (2016.Fall #21) BCAR risk categories: ICU (see BCAR.Cdn) natural cat stress-test:
- methodE (2015.Spring #17) cat frequency & severity:
- driverstolerance: for stressed BCAR score natural cat stress-test:
- BCAR vs CIA.DCATE (2013.Fall #27) cat risk management natural cat stress-test:
- method
In Plain English!
The Concept of Tolerance
In assessing the financial strength of a company, Best calculates a standard BCAR score and a stressed BCAR score.
Question: what is the difference between a standard BCAR score and a stressed BCAR score
- standard score:
- a measure of an insurer's financial strength (includes a component for catastrophes)
- an insurer is then assigned 1 of 6 ratings based on it's standard score (strongest, very strong, strong, adequate, weak, very weak)
- standard score:
- stressed score:
- a score that reflects the ability of an insurer to continue operating even after a catastrophe (based on natural catastrophe stress test)
- → the standard BCAR score already has a catastrophe component so the stressed score measures the impact of a second catastrophe
- an insurer is then assigned 1 of 6 ratings based on it's stressed score (will be the same or lower than its standard score)
- Note: the stress-test is necessary because an insurer still has cat exposure, even after the first cat event (Ex: aftershocks after a big earthquake)
- stressed score:
- Important: an insurer's final rating may stay the same or be lowered based on it's stressed BCAR score (this is where the concept of tolerance arises)
Question: what factors are considered in determining whether to adjust an insurer's rating based on it's stressed BCAR score
- Best will keep an insurer's rating (in other words, tolerate it's stressed BCAR score) based on these considerations:
- financial flexibility: tolerance is HIGHER if the company is willing & able to replace capital after an event
- historical volatility: tolerance is LOWER if the company has as history of volatile operating performance
- frequency of severe exposures: tolerance is LOWER if the company has multiple exposures to severe events in a single season
- risk management: tolerance is HIGHER if the company has good/experienced risk management
- Best will keep an insurer's rating (in other words, tolerate it's stressed BCAR score) based on these considerations:
Example: Suppose insurer A and B both have a Best rating of strong based on their standard BCAR scores.
* Given the information below, which insurer is likely to keep it's rating, which is likely to have it lowered based on a stressed BCAR score of adequate.
- Insurer A: relatively young, never experienced a catastrophe, large swings in operating results
- Insurer B: well-established, experienced 2 moderate catastrophes in the last 18 years with only small swings in operating results
- Answer:
- Insurer A is likely to have its rating lowered because of inexperienced risk management and historical volatility.
- Insurer B will likely keep its rating because of proven cat management ability and consistency in operating results.
- Another way of saying this is that insurer A has a lower tolerance for its stressed BCAR score, while insurer B has a higher tolerance.
mini BattleQuiz 1 You must be logged in or this will not work.
Natural Catastrophe Stress Test
In the previous section, we discussed the stressed BCAR score. This score is based on something called the natural catastrophe stress test. The purpose of this test is to give insights on the balance sheet strength after it experiences a catastrophic event.
Question: what are the steps in the natural catastrophe stress test
- surplus: reduce reported surplus by PML (net post-tax 1-in-100 year event)
- reinsurance: increase reinsurance recoverables by at least 40% of ceded PML
- reserves: increase reserves by 40% of net PML
- reinsurance structure: adjust net pre-tax PMLs used in stress test if reinsurance structure changes after first event occurrence
- After completing these 4 steps, recalculate the BCAR score according to the standard methodology.
- Note: This is slightly different from the answer given in examiner's reports for 2018.Spring and prior. (The syllabus changed for 2024.Spring)
There is a forum thread regarding a calculation problem based on the natural catastrophe stress test. I think a calculation problem on this is unlikely but you can read my answer and see what you think.
Cat Risk Management
This concept overlaps with OSFI.Eqk, and provides a good review.
Question: what are the elements of strong cat risk management according to AM Best
- catastrophe modeling:
- What-if scenario testing
- Parameter selection
- Base model output on realistic loss estimates
- Use more than 1 model
- data quality:
- accurate property location & coding (type of building)
- accurate property value & insurance-to-value
- conduct site reviews (so that information is up-to-date)
- safeguards to prevent manipulation by agent/underwriter (possibly on behalf of the insured)
- aggregate loss exposure: use aggregate losses as a secondary test of model and to consider unmodelled scenarios
- monitoring (MML): Measure, Monitor, Limit exposure on a continuous basis
- catastrophe modeling:
The mini BattleQuiz also has an old exam question that asks you to compare BCAR to the FCT.
mini BattleQuiz 2 You must be logged in or this will not work.
BattleCodes
Memorize:
- 4 factors affecting tolerance for stressed BCAR scores
- 4-step method for the natural catastrophe stress-test
- 4 elements of strong cat risk management (overlaps with OSFI.Eqk)
Conceptual:
- Be able to apply the concept of tolerance to an example such as the one above.
Calculational:
- none
Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.
POP QUIZ ANSWERS
- All of these are good risk management techniques for dealing with risk exposure, catastrophe or otherwise, but it's especially important with a potentially severe loss.
- Call it MML (measure, monitor, limit)