Difference between revisions of "CAS.ATRA"

From Exam 6 Canada
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Keywords)
(BattleTable)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
|-
 
|-
! style='width: 175px;' | reference !! style='width: 175px;' | part (a) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (b) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (c) !! part (d) !! style='width: 10px;' | x
+
! style='width: 175px;' | reference !! style='width: 175px;' | part (a) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (b) !! style='width: 175px;' | part (c) !! part (d) !! style='width: 10px;'
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
|-
 
|-
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2018_2-Fall)_(09).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2018.Fall #9)'''</span>
+
|| [https://www.battleactsmain.ca/pdf/Exam_(2018_2-Fall)/(2012_2-Fall)_(11).pdf <span style='font-size: 12px; background-color: yellow; border: solid; border-width: 1px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 2px 5px 2px 5px; margin: 5px;'>E</span>] <span style='color: red;'>'''(2012.Fall #11)'''</span>
|| '''tort reform''': <br> - class action cases
+
|| '''some topic''': <br> -  
|| '''litigation system''': <br> - jury service reform
+
|| '''some topic''': <br> -  
| style="background-color: lightgrey" |
+
|| '''some topic''': <br> -  
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey" |
 
| style="background-color: lightgrey" |
  

Revision as of 19:09, 27 April 2019

ATRA = American Tort Reform Association. This is a U.S.-centric paper, so is of lesser importance, although there was a question worth 1.75pts from the 2012 exam. (Question #11)   Forum

Pop Quiz

According to Harris, what are the proposed reforms for Canada's tort laws: [Hint: JCCV]

BattleTable

reference part (a) part (b) part (c) part (d) style='width: 10px;'
E (2018.Fall #9) tort reform:
- class action cases
litigation system:
- jury service reform
E (2012.Fall #11) some topic:
-
some topic:
-
some topic:
-

In Plain English!

This is a short reading that simply lists 10 tort reform initiatives. There has only ever been 1 question from this reading, 2012.Fall #11abc. It dealt with the initiative on punitive damages. This is probably all you have to know.

mini BattleQuiz 1 You must be logged in or this will not work.

For completeness, I created a memory trick to remember all 10 initiatives: CRAP-CAN-PPJ. I took the 1st letter of each item in the list from the reading, rearranged it to try to make a word, and that's what I came up with. If you have to take a CRAP, you do it in the CAN. The PPJ part is just the leftover letters that don't make a word. Obviously you wouldn't be asked to list all 10 initiatives - it's probably enough just to know CRAP!

Shout-out to NZ for a variation on the above memory trick! JPP-CAN-CRAP or Junior Political Parties CAN CRAP under pressure.

Note that 2 of ATRA's reforms are the same as 2 of the proposals in Harris.Tort: (See pop quiz.)

  • Eliminate the Collateral source rule so that plaintiffs cannot double-recover. (The collateral source rule violates the principle of indemnity.)
  • Replace joint and several liability with a system of proportionate liability.

Bedtime reading: I don't think you need to know anything in depth, but it's only 5 pages and easy to read. Maybe it will help you fall asleep!

mini BattleQuiz 2 You must be logged in or this will not work.

BattleCodes

Memorize:

  • issues surrounding ATRA reforms regarding punitive damages
  • 3-4 of ATRA's proposed tort reforms

Conceptual:

  • Understand that 2 of ATRA's reforms are similar to proposed Canadian reforms in Harris.Tort

Calculational:

  • none

Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.

  Forum

POP QUIZ ANSWERS

Proposed reforms to Canada's tort laws:

J: Joint & Several Liabiity

  • defn: plaintiff may recover (ANY or ALL damages) from (ANY or ALL defendants) regardless of share of liability
  • proposal: ERF
  • ELIMINATE J&S: for non-pecuniary damages
  • REPLACE J&S: with rule of proportionate liability
  • FUND creation: for guilty parties that can't pay
  • advantages/disadvantages:
  • ADVANTAGES: discourages search for deep pockets & decreases costs
  • DISADVANTAGES: increases costs in (determining proportionate liability)

C: Collateral Source Rule (eliminate) C: Compensation Basis (change to net basis) ← CORRECTION! (This had incorrectly said change to gross basis) V: Vicarious Liability (eliminate)