FSCO.Covgs
Reading: “What do the coverages mean?,” October 2014.
Authour: Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO)
BA Quick-Summary: Earthquakes
|
Contents
Pop Quiz
- What are some proposed reforms to Canada's plaintiff-friendly tort system?
Keywords
accident benefits, minor injury, catastrophic injury, tort deductible
In Plain English!
Intro
There are 2 sections in this short reading:
- What do the coverages mean?
- What do the terms mean?
Each section is just a list of defns. This reading is specific to Ontario auto insurance, so I don't think the CAS wants you to memorize all of these definitions. (Many of them are obvious anyway.) Instead you must ask yourself:
- Why is this reading on the syllabus?
- What would be good exam questions?
I scanned the list of coverages and terms, and a few things jumped out: |
- accidents benefits
- This is one of the major ongoing problems with auto insurance in Ontario.
- catastrophic injury
- This relates to two of the legal cases from the Landmark Legal Cases reading.
- tort deductible
- There are other syllabus readings related to the tort system, so this strikes me as a topic of importance. (Harris.Tort, Dav.NonPec, AAA.Asbestos)
- minor injury
- This relates to accident benefits coverage, and classification of an injury as a "minor injury" is intended to help bring costs down in this area. Here is an interesting article from the Toronto Star from 2013: Ontario Minor Injury Cap
Possible Questions
Above, we identified 4 important topics. Let's try to think of a few good exam questions based on those topics. (I'm just brainstorming! You should do the same!)
Accident Benefits and Minor Injury |
AccBen 1: Auto insurance afforability is a major issue. Identify a coverage that is a major contributor to these costs.
- You could answer either accident benefits or Third Party Liability (bodily injury), but accident benefits is the better answer here.
AccBen 2: Identify a strategy for controlling these costs.
- A good answer would be the introduction of minor injury guidelines with a cap on compensation of $3,500.
AccBen 3: If this cap were challenged in court, what would be the likely outcome? Explain your reasoning, and cite any relevant precedents.
- Likely outcome: cap would be upheld
- Precedent: Morrow v Zhang (challenged the minor injury cap in Alberta in 2004, and the cap was upheld on appeal.)
Catastrophic Injury |
Cat 1: How is a catastrophic injury defined for Ontario auto insurance?
- serious, life-threatening, loss of limbs, eyesight,...
Cat 2: Why would a victim want to have their injury classified as catastrophic?
- There is a higher level of benefits when the injury is catastrophic.
Cat 3: Fully describe an Ontario legal case related to catastrophic injury.
- You could describe either Kusnierz v Economical or Aviva v Pastore.
Tort Deductible |
Tort Deductible 1: Define the term tort deductible
- the amount that is deducted from a settlement or court award for pain and suffering
Tort Deductible 2: If a victim is awarded $35,000 for pain and suffering and the tort deductible is $30,000, what is the net amount the victim receives.
- $5,000
Tort Deductible 3: What is the purpose of a tort deductible?
- to reduce litigation of minor claims (because if the award is less than the deductible, the net amount received by the victim would be zero anyway)
Tort Deductible 4: What is the current cap on awards for pain and suffering?
- $100,000 inflation-adjusted from 1978, but subject to certain exceptions (sexual abuse, defamation, negligence causing financial damage)
Tort Deductible 5: What are some proposed reforms to Canada's tort laws?
- JCCV: Do you remember what this means??!! If not, review Harris.Tort.
BattleCodes
- Memorize:
- defns: accident benefits, minor injury, catastrophic injury, tort deductible
- Conceptual:
- How do these terms relate to other topics on the syllabus?
- Calculational:
- none
Full BattleQuiz You must be logged in or this will not work.
POP QUIZ ANSWERS
- Proposed reforms to Canada's tort system: JCCV
- J: Joint & Several Liabiity (eliminate for non-pecuniary damages)
- C: Collateral Source Rule (eliminate)
- C: Compensation Basis (change to net basis)
- V: Vicarious Liability (eliminate)
- See Harris.Tort for details